ABSTRACT
Purpose: The evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is limited so far. Our purpose is to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of a large series of KT with COVID-19 breakthrough infection and compare them with unvaccinated patients. As a secondary objective, we analyzed the evolution according to the type of mRNA vaccine administered. Method(s): From April to October 2021, KT recipients with COVID-19, included in the COVID-19 registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology, were analyzed. Data regarding vaccination status and type of vaccine were collected and outcomes of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients were compared with fully vaccinated patients. Result(s): Clinical picture was similar and survival analysis showed no differences between groups: 21.7% of fully vaccinated patients and 20.8% of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated died (p=.776). In multivariable analysis age and pneumonia were independent risk factors for death, while vaccination status was not related to mortality. These results remained similar when we excluded patients with partial vaccination as well as when we analyzed exclusively hospitalized patients. Patients vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (n=213) showed a significantly lower mortality than those who received BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine (n=121) (16.4% vs. 28.8%, p=.002) (HR: 0.52, CI 95% 0.31-0.85, p=.010). Conclusion(s): COVID-19 severity in KT patients has remained high and has not improved despite receiving 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine, but the mRNA-1273 vaccine shows higher clinical effectiveness than BNT162b2 in KT recipients with breakthrough infection, so it could be considered as the first option in these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 in kidney transplants has a high risk of complications and mortality, especially in older recipients diagnosed during the early period after transplantation. Management of immunosuppression has been challenging during the pandemic. We investigated the impact of induction immunosuppression, either basiliximab or thymoglobulin, on the clinical evolution of kidney transplants developing COVID-19 during the early period after transplantation. METHOD: Kidney transplant recipients with <6 months with a functioning graft diagnosed of COVID-19 from the initial pandemic outbreak (March 2020) until 31 July 2021 from different Spanish centres participating in a nationwide registry. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients from 17 Spanish centres developed COVID-19 during the first 6 months after transplantation, 73 (57.5%) received basiliximab and 54 (42.5%) thymoglobulin. Demographics were not different between groups, but patients receiving thymoglobulin were more sensitized (cPRA of 32.7% ± 40.8% versus 5.6% ± 18.5%) and more frequently re-transplanted (30% versus 4%). Recipients older than 65 years treated with thymoglobulin showed the highest rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome [64.7% versus 37.1% for older recipients receiving thymoglobulin and basiliximab (P < .05), and 23.7% and 18.9% for young recipients receiving basiliximab and thymoglobulin (P > .05)] and the poorest survival [mortality rate of 64.7% and 42.9% for older recipients treated with thymoglobulin and basiliximab, respectively (P < .05), and 8.1% and 10.5% for young recipients treated with thymoglobulin and basiliximab (P > .05)]. Older recipients treated with thymoglobulin showed the poorest survival in the Cox's regression model adjusted for comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Thymoglobulin should be used with caution in older recipients during the present pandemic era.